ScreenJelly

Thursday, March 7, 2013

"What makes great teachers great?"

Yes, what makes them great? It's a question the answer to which everybody wants to know. It's also the topic of this talk on "TVO", which was recorded and broadcast on You Tube. You can watch the talk here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FXaLGt460e4. I am sure you will enjoy it.

The following quotes from the talk really impress me:

The key word is empathy; great teachers truly understand what make their students tick; they are confident enough to be themselves with their kids; the ability to be relaxed, to be self-assured; passionate about their students.

We can make great teachers; great teachers become great. They start with something - openess, flexibility, eagerness to make a difference.

It's not about control; it's not about overplanning; it's not about a delivery; it's about a truly interactive experience.

Learning is an intensely sensory experience. 

Watching and listening to the talk, do you see any connection between this talk and the article about humanistic language teaching that I posted on this blog a few days ago? It's about people, see, not techniques or test scores or facilities. Yes, a great teacher is one who makes students feel the joy of learning. And that's what is missing in Vietnam now. Is there anything we can do about this?
--
If you like the talk, perhaps you should consider watching these youtube broadcasts also:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lOZgkmsyQnc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OnfzZEREfQs

Monday, March 4, 2013

"Humanistic language learning" (British Council 2005)

Have you ever asked yourself why Vietnamese students cannot learn English, as proved again and again by the fact that not many students get the required level of proficiency when they graduate, and that international employers often complain about the lack of English proficiency of Vietnamese employees?

This happens in spite of all the endless classes of English they have had to attend, from high school to college, a total of no less than 1000 hours of teaching altogether if you count on average 4 hours of English per week for 7 years in high school (ie, 840 hours), plus another 150 hours (minimum, as required by MOET) at college level. 

Not to mention the fact that in this age of globalisation, students have a much better chance to be in contact with the language, through the media and social networks as well face-to-face or virtual interactions with English-speaking people, which is supposed to greatly enhance language acquisition?

In the same thread, have you ever asked yourself why some older people (50 years old and above) are so good at learning not just one language but several languages, say, at least French (and Chinese for some) as well as English, even though they learned them by very old-fashioned, traditional and often thought of as ineffective method which is call the Grammar-Translation Method, which nobody dares to (admit that they do) use to teach students now?

I guess you must have, at least once in your professional life, right? Well, if you haven't, then I have, several times, without actually trying to find the answer (I cannot change the way things are, anyway, thought I, so why care?) But then a few days ago a friend of mine mentioned the lack of joy in learning in the Vietnamese classroom of today (in Vietnamese, he said something like ngày nay học sinh học khổ sở và không có nụ cười nên không thành công được, có lẽ đã đến lúc VN cần nhập khẩu nụ cười!), which very much reminded me of an approach to language teaching and learning that I strongly believe in, but seems to be lost now in Vietnam, and that is, THE HUMANISTIC APPROACH TO LANGUAGE TEACHING.

And Eureka, things clicked! I found the answer to the above-mentioned questions, thanks to my friend's mentioning of the joy of learning and value of smiles. Yes if you do things smilingly, things seem so easy, but if you things with grudges, they become impossible! So true!

if you are confused, then let me clarify this: the humanistic approach does not impose any particular technique, so you can use grammar or dictation or translation or watching films or listening to the news on radio or interact with your friends and colleagues on facebook, but it must be about people and joy (and I think, choice!). 

If I have to define humanistic teaching/learning, I will use my friend's reference to joy and smiles above, to say that "humanistic teaching/learning is an approach where people teach/learn because they enjoy what they teach/learn, ie, they do it with a smile!" And I believe the oder people that I mentioned above were successful in language learning because they loved reading Hemingway, translating Dickens, watching Batman on TV, or singing Carpenters' songs.

Yes, they did those things for love. Remember O' Henry's short story entitled "A Service of Love"? "When one loves one's art, no service seems too hard!"

So, friends and colleagues, don't ever forget the humanistic approach. It's not for nothing that the approach is called humanistic: it's fit for human beings. Yes, we are human beings, and language is something that distinguishes us from other species, so don't forget to be humanistic in all things, including in your language teaching (learning).

And please read the article below to understand more about humanistic language teaching and learning.
-----------
Humanistic language teaching

'Humanism' is one of those constructs that people argue about passionately. Instead of attempting to define it, perhaps it makes more sense to focus on some commonly agreed characteristics of humanism. These are: problem-solving, reasoning, free will, self-development, and co-operation.

  • Humanism and learning theory

  • The humanistic teacher

  • Humanism in practice
    • Teaching language items
    • Teaching skills
    • The teacher's status
    • Flexibility

  • Conclusion


Humanism and learning theory Perhaps the most well-known applications of humanism in ELT are those of Curran (1976) and Gattegno (1972).

  • The former advocated the use of 'Counselling-Learning'. In this practice, teachers sit outside a circle of learners and help them to talk about their personal and linguistic problems. The students decide the 'curriculum', while the teacher is more of a facilitator, who fosters an emotionally secure environment.

  • Meanwhile, Gattegno advocated the Silent Way approach. In this, he presented challenges for learners. These challenges developed the students' awareness and encouraged their independence.


It's my view that it's possible to apply the characteristics of humanism to ELT in a less radical way than described in the practices above. In a way that might be more appealing for students, more practicable for teachers, and more plausible for education inspectors.

The humanistic teacher

The humanistic teacher should have a good grasp of language learning theories. They will realise the importance of change, which is implicit in all learning.

  • They will be aware of the individual learners' 'developmental readiness' (Piaget, 1970), which will determine when and how to teach each student something.

  • They will offer their students problems to solve, as, according to cognitivists, this is precisely how we learn things.

  • Above all, the successful humanistic teacher will probably be a pragmatist - allowing a combination of language learning theories and their own experience to interact with each other to produce effective language lessons.


The humanistic teacher also needs to be aware of what motivates their students. Some will probably want to learn English because they have to (e.g. for their job), while others want to simply for the sake of it. The former is called 'extrinsic motivation', while the latter is called 'intrinsic motivation'.

  • Those students who are more extrinsically motivated will be more goal-oriented and might want, for example, a lot of tests and exams.

  • Students who are intrinsically motivated will derive a lot of satisfaction from solving language problems - the solution will be a reward in itself.


In reality, of course, students can be both intrinsically and extrinsically motivated. They may be learning English for a specific purpose (e.g. to be accepted into a speech community or to get promotion), but they might also really enjoy the process of learning.

  • Teachers need to be aware of this mix and need to use this information to determine issues like:
    • How much testing to do
    • How much fun can be had
    • Should the target language be representative of one particular speech community or not?

Humanism in practice

Teaching 'language items' In an attempt to be a humanistic language teacher myself, I introduce every new language item at the optimum time of readiness for my class.

  • I firstly elicit the target language. This fosters a sense of co-operation between the students and me.

  • Then I try to make the meaning of the language items as clear as possible by using a number of techniques (e.g. pictures, mime, or a mini-explanation). Such work on the concept of the target language needs to be repeated later in a way that is appropriate to the abilities and progress of the group.

  • At the appropriate time, students also need to practise speech production by saying or writing the target language.

  • After enough practice, through both teacher-centred and student-centred phases, the student should gradually learn the target language. The student will have fundamentally changed.


Teaching skills As I want my classes to be able to understand the 'gist' of a spoken interaction, I make sure that they are mentally prepared for it. This means that:

  • The 'text' is not dauntingly hard for them

  • I create the right conditions for understanding the text by, for example, arousing interest and pre-teaching lexis

  • Then, by setting an appropriate task I am setting a problem for the students to solve. If I can steer my students towards focusing on the main points of the text then I am enabling learners to become more successful listeners.

  • After this, students can be encouraged to carry out their own, related, role plays, with the result that students' ability to carry out certain situation-specific interactions will be enhanced. It's worth noting that these principles relate to reading texts too!


The teacher's status It cannot be denied that the teacher plays a different role from that of his/her students. We each have a particular job. This does not mean, though, that we have higher status. We are certainly not in the classroom to order people around. I try to provide students with learning opportunities, which the students are free to take or not.

  • However, if a student chooses not to take up an opportunity, and then goes on to become a malign influence in class, I then ask the rest of the class if their learning is being affected and whether they want the offending student to stay in class or not. I then have the authority to ask the student to leave.


Flexibility Without flexibility, a teacher cannot teach humanistically, because students will never learn completely in step with any designated syllabus. This is why I always make a point of observing my students very carefully so that I know when to introduce certain tasks, according to the progress they're making.

  • The same applies to lesson plans. I know that if I plough on through my plan regardless of how my students are responding, some students will be lost forever and lose confidence both in me and their own ability to learn English.


Conclusion
The thrust of humanism seems, to me, to be the ability to advance as a species through understanding and co-operation. This means that humanistic language teachers need to have a thorough grasp of both how people learn and what motivates them to learn. They need to shed the old image of the teacher being the fount of wisdom and replace it with the teacher as facilitator.

Further reading Counseling-Learning in Second Languages by Curran C. Apple River
Teaching Foreign Languages in Schools: The Silent Way by Gattegno C. Educational Solutions
Structuralism by Piaget J. Basic Books
'Class, Status, and Party' in Essays from Max Weber by Weber M. Routledge and Kegan Paul
Humanising Language Teaching. An online journal for language teachers.
www.hltmag.co.uk

Written by Paul Bress
http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/articles/humanistic-language-teaching

Monday, February 18, 2013

Good read: "Language: A window to other worlds"

Below is a very good article for language teachers and learners alike. The source is here: http://ofwordsandworlds.wordpress.com/2013/02/17/language-a-window-to-other-worlds/

Enjoy!
-------------

Language: a window to other worlds

Warning: The following article may contain blanket generalisations about national characteristics. If you are offended by stereotypes based on your country of origin, turn back now.

The Spanish are always late. The Germans are very well organised. Americans are brash and uncultured. At some point in their lives, inhabitants of every country will inevitably find themselves judged based on characteristics perceived to be common among those who share their nationality. It’s often a great source of irritation to us when we travel abroad – “We’re not all like that!” we exclaim in our own defence. “That’s just a stereotype!” Yet we are often guilty of the same behaviour, whether we realise it or not.

So why do national stereotypes exist? The fact of the matter is: they’re useful. Different regions and cultures throughout the world all have, to a greater or lesser extent, a common set of values and behaviours that have evolved over time – ranging from national cuisine and dance to a shared belief in more abstract concepts, such friendliness to strangers or freedom of speech. This isn’t a bad thing – it’s what makes each place unique and gives us the wealth of diverse cultures we see around the world today.

However, it does provide something of a barrier when dealing with people with a different cultural background to our own. Familiarity with these different values is essential to ensure good mutual relations. For example, knowing that Germans generally set great store by punctuality may give us extra impetus to ensure that we are on-time and fully prepared for a meeting with an important Bavarian client, so that the business partnership gets off on the right foot. However, the issue with such stereotypes is that, while almost all of them have some basis in truth, they are often very general or reflective of out-dated attitudes. When applied without due care, national stereotypes can often have the opposite of the intended effect, bludgeoning a potentially fruitful relationship to death before it has chance to blossom.

How best to navigate this intercultural minefield, then? A complete disregard for received wisdom on different cultures could be just as disastrous as an over-reliance on it. One way of developing a deeper understanding of a country’s culture is to make yourself familiar with the language. As a shared form of communication within a culture, it stands to reason that the local language reflects the area’s shared values and identity. Learning the native tongue opens a window to these views, and allows us to see the world from the perspective of a different people.

Throughout my years of studying linguistics, I have always been fascinated by the aspects that make each language unique. English, for instance, seems to involve a disproportionate number of outlandish idioms: it rains cats and dogs; drug addicts go cold turkey; jealousy is a green-eyed monster. The world is our oyster, so we often do things off our own bat instead of just standing around like lemons. In fact, we’re completely bat-ty. I often feel that the way we describe the world is, quite frankly, bonkers. It must seem like some sort of cruel obstacle course to any poor soul learning English as a second language. Yet there is something in this approach that reflects part of our national psyche – we are nothing if not eccentric, and pride ourselves on our often surreal sense of humour; our ability to make light of any given situation.

Likewise, the Swedish language has a number of unique words that reflect a sense of homeliness and a desire for comfort and familiarity shared by many of the country’s population. The verb “trivas” translates roughly as “to feel at home,” but it also conveys so much more: a sense of belonging and complete satisfaction; a feeling that everything is right with the world. It isn’t restricted to home – a swimmer may “trivs” in water, or a rock star on a stage. Wherever the location, the existence of this word indicates a state of being that is obviously a central value for many Swedes.

There are many other examples of how language reflects common national characteristics and attitudes. It could be argued that the complex yet logical structure of German grammar is reflective of the people’s practical and systematic approach to everyday problem solving.  Saami tribes have an astoundingly diverse catalogue of words for categorizing the reindeer they herd, including goaisu (the male reindeer who keeps apart all the summer and is very fat when autumn comes) and spahči (one with tall, slender and quivering antlers). Meanwhile, on the banks of the Brahmaputra river, the Boro word gobra, “to fall into a well unknowingly,” tells us of an issue that is presumably widespread in north-east Indian society. The latter also has words to differentiate between different types of love – perhaps indicative of a greater level of emotional openness and intelligence that that prevalent in prim-and-proper British society.

I could carry on ad infinitum – the examples are many and varied, and this is one of the main reasons I love learning different languages. Wrestling with new terms and concepts for which we have no direct equivalent in our own language forces us to embrace new perspectives and see the world through someone else’s eyes. While we can make estimations of people’s attitudes based on their national background, without knowledge of how they describe the world themselves, we will always be on the outside looking in, unable to truly see through their eyes or walk in their shoes. As such, our ability to understand how their culture works will remain limited, at best. The more familiar we are with someone’s way of thinking, the more able we are to empathise with them and thus develop a good mutual understanding.

In today’s global village, it is more important than ever that we are all on the same wavelength, and language is essential to this. No individual should be judged solely based on where they come from, but on first encounters, we often have little else to go off. National stereotypes are useful tool, yet one that is often clumsy and blunt. A knowledge of different languages allows us to hone this tool and wield it more skilfully, broadening our perspective and allowing us to open the window to worlds outside our own.

Friday, February 15, 2013

The Grammar-Translation Method: Any place for it in today's classroom?

The Grammar-Translation Method is a traditional language teaching-learning method that was very popular all over the world before the emergence of the Audio-Lingual Method in the 1970s, but since then has been discredited and fallen into disfavour. But is it really that bad? I, for one, do not think so. I, for one (and I know many like me), have been a success story for the Grammar-Translation Method because it was the only method that I know of before I went overseas for my post-graduate studies. And my achievements were, I must say, rather impressive! The first time I took an international English test (it was the TOEFL) without any preparation was in 1989 when I had an opportunity to go to the US on a short visit (10 weeks), and my scores were 630 on the paper-based TOEFL. And the second time I took an international English test - again without prepparation - was in 1993 when the IELTS first came out, and I got 8.5!

So there must be something to this method, right? If you are curious to learn more about this method, then read the following article that I just found on the Internet. The link is here: http://injapan.gaijinpot.com/live/learning-japanese/2012/05/15/the-grammar-translation-method-really-all-that-bad/. I've copied it to my blog so that I can keep it and read again, or use it in my teaching when needed.

Enjoy!
------------
When it comes to teaching languages, the grammar-translation method has become the child nobody loves or wants to acknowledge. But is it really hell on toast? No, it ain’t . There, I said it. Leave it to Seeroi to be the one to defend something he doesn’t even like, but hey, somebody’s gotta stand up for the downtrodden.

Before getting into a whole deep analysis, let’s talk booze, if for no other reason than it’s a whole lot more interesting than grammar.

So I went to a gaijin bar last Saturday, which I rarely do anymore, since I’m always hanging out with old drunk Japanese dudes in izakayas. But for some reason I was walking by this place and I saw a Guinness sign and I remembered, Hey, I love that beverage. So in I went.

Just in case you’ve never been to Japan or live in a cave or something, a “gaijin bar” is what the Japanese call a tavern full of drunk English teachers. For some reason, the bars always resemble Irish pubs, despite the fact that there’s only about four Irish people in the whole nation. Yet another mystery of the Orient, I know.

The thing about English teachers is they’re loud. And you know who you are, so don’t try to deny it. Also, they like to drink horrible booze in horrible ways, like shots of tequila. Personally, I hate tequila, ever since that time in college when I drank a bottle of Jose Cuervo, walked halfway home in the pouring rain thinking I was Jesus, stopped off at a Laundromat, and tried to dry my body by climbing into the clothes dryer. That doesn’t work very well, let me tell you. I finally got a ride home in the back of a squad car, which actually is way more convenient than a taxi. True story. Painfully true.

Anyway, what was my point? Oh yeah. That I don’t really like tequila or gaijin bars. I’d just as soon avoid them, but I can also see they serve a purpose. If nothing else, I don’t have to worry about hordes of college guys slamming Irish Car Bombs in my izakayas. I feel the same way about the grammar-translation method. It may be a rough way to accomplish what you’re after, but it’ll do in a pinch.
What is the Grammar-Translation Method?
The grammar-translation method is widely hated by EFL/ESL instructors, even without clearly defining what the method is. It often serves as a catch-all for the repetitive, overly academic, and terminally boring language classes most of us sat through in school. Classes are also primarily conducted in the native language of the teacher and the students, a big no-no the EFL/ESL world.
At its core, the grammar-translation method seems to embody five concepts:
  1. Learning grammar rules
  2. Translating back and forth between the target language and the student’s native language
  3. Memorizing lists of words
  4. Utilizing exercises and tests in constrained ways
  5. Explicit error correction
I say “seems to,” because there isn’t actually a “How to teach the grammar-translation method” book. The “method,” as such, is not prescriptive, but rather descriptive. The description dates back to a 1903 book, in which the author describes the horrible, boring classes children of former centuries were forced to endure, presumably while on break from working at their looms.
Criticism of the Criticisms
If you do a quick search for “Grammar-translation Method,” you’ll probably notice something striking. Anyway, I did. A lot of descriptions of the method (whatever one conceives it to be) use roughly the same verbiage, which sounds like everyone’s just parroting everyone else. Also, there’s no shortage of hyperbole.

Here’s one example: The Grammar Translation Method is an old method which was originally used to teach dead languages.

Hmm. “Old method,” “originally used,” and “dead language” all add a little spin to help reinforce the writer’s point. Of course I love that, because it’s just the kind of thing that I’d do.

So let me try: The Grammar Translation Method is a well-established method which has long been used to teach some of the world’s great languages.
So that’s a fun game.

Now look, I’m not actually arguing that the method is all peas and carrots, only that some of the criticisms might be overblown. Man, when I gotta be the voice of reason, you know you’re in trouble. 

Here’s another one:
Error correction: If a student’s answer of a question is incorrect, the teacher selects a different student to give the correct answer or s/he replies himself/herself.


You know, I’ve seen Japanese students fairly bludgeoned to death with that style of teaching. It’s terrible, I agree. But I’ve also seen the same five points accomplished by skillful teachers in ways that are useful and engaging.
So humiliating students is part of the method? Again, Hmm, I say, only this time I mean it. Sounds more like the way a given teacher chose to implement the method rather than the method itself.
You know, I’ve seen Japanese students fairly bludgeoned to death with that style of teaching. It’s terrible, I agree. But I’ve also seen the same five points accomplished by skillful teachers in ways that are useful and engaging. There are lots of teaching styles that accomplish error correction without simultaneously humiliating people. Just as there are ways to teach grammar that involve games and student input. Maybe that’s a modification on the original method. Fair enough. The light-bulb has changed a lot of the years too, and it’s still a light-bulb. Whatever. What I’m suggesting is that rather than vilify the method entirely, try to understand where it succeeds and use what works.

The Act of Balancing
According to world-famous linguist/egoist K. Seeroi in Why are Japaneses so Bad at English?, one reason students can’t speak English is that they don’t have sufficient opportunities for practice. And certainly, to the extent that people are silently studying lists of words and grammar rules, their speaking time is necessarily limited. But there’s no reason that the grammar-translation method can’t be used as a supplement to a more communicative approach. Learn grammar rules and vocabulary for a third of the class, then practice using them in spoken conversation for the remainder. Or make one out of every five classes a grammar class. We live in a universe abounding with options. Actually, here’s a little more scholarly paper (not mine, sigh) that argues for a balanced approach.
The Last Word
Okay, there’s never going to be a last word, because everybody’s got a different teaching style and idea of what’s best. But before disposing of baby with bathwater, let’s consider how we might implement the five points in a way that leverages their strengths.

  1. Learning grammar rules
    Okay, you don’t want to go crazy on this, because you risk loading people up on theories that they fail to carry forth into practice. At the same time, it’s useful to know some rules. とおり follows verbs and どおり follows nouns. Learning a few basic rules can help to avoid internalizing a ton of simple mistakes.
  2. Translating back and forth between the target language and the speaker’s native language
    “How do you say _____ in English/Japanese?” is a pretty common question. If you speak more than one language, you’ll probably field this question a lot. It can be instructive to practice translating, even fun. You just gotta pick the right material and use the right approach. Maybe you want to take it easy on the Beowulf.
  3. Memorizing lists of words
    This doesn’t have to be super-boring, and the payoff is good. It’s often implemented as a writing activity, but there’s no reason it can’t be part of conversation practice or a blended approach.
  4. Utilizing exercises and tests in constrained ways
    “It ain’t no fun ___ the homies can’t have none.” Now fill in the blank. These are great group activities. That there are plenty of creative exercises that can reinforce grammar in practical and student-centered ways.
  5. Explicit error correction
    I’m not a fan of direct correction, because corrections are difficult for students to remember and apply, and having your errors handed to you on a stick is de-motivating as hell. On the other hand, if you see a lot of students making the same mistake, you might need to point it out to the class as a whole. Or create another activity that enables learners to see their own mistakes in a non-confrontational way. A friend of mine teaches the use of the plural for animals with an exercise illustrating that “I like dog” means food, not pets. Me personally, I like flying squirrel. So cute and delicious.

And Back to the Pub
If there’s one thing I’ve learned in life, it’s not to drink an entire bottle of tequila. Because doing a whole lot of anything is usually a bad idea. Same for the bar, same for the classroom, I always say. Mixing things up will teach you a lesson you’re guaranteed to remember the next day. So just provide your students a little grammar, plenty of conversation, and then at the end, a couple shots of tequila. Guaranteed they’ll be speaking in tongues in no time.

Friday, February 8, 2013

Teaching ESL/EFL to adult learners

Teaching English (ESL/EFL) to adult learners are completely different from teaching young learners, as all experienced teachers will know. The reason is simple: adult learners have very clear goals about what they want to learn and how they are going to achieve that; also, they have very limited time and do not accept "wasting" their most precious and scare resources playing around with the language for no particular purpose at all.

Therefore, to teach English to adults successfully one needs to follow methods and techniques that are fit for adults. Fortunately there are a lot of resources available on the web for you to make use of. Below are some tips that I found useful and want to share with you all. Please read below.

-----
Source: http://www.eslpartyland.com/tips-for-teaching-esl-to-adults.html

Tips for Teaching ESL to Adults

Education, employment, recreation, and leisure have all gone global. People of different nationalities, in an attempt to seek greener pastures, now seek employment overseas. Even students do the same as well. Students who can afford to be enrolled in a prestigious school often leave their home countries to study, as many believe that this would present greater opportunities for them in the future. Also, many people nowadays resort to overseas travels to be able to relax and have a good time. As a whole, these situations indicate that, in the past few decades, globalization has grown significantly. As a result, many people seek the help of English instructors to be able speak and understand English �?? the Universal Language. In addition, the majority of these non-native English speakers are adults, which is why more and more English instructors adapt to teaching methods that are suitable for adults who come from various countries and cultures.

ESL instructors for adults must be aware of the fact that the learning patterns of an adult slightly differ from that of a child. An average adult, according to research, is expected to be self-directed and must have a set of goals ready for learning a particular subject. These two factors alone imply that the adult ESL teaching methods are slightly different from those methods that are intended for young learners. In addition, the learning environment and the lessons should be formal and systematized. Since the demand for ESL lessons should be more focused on adult learning, here are some of the things to keep in mind while teaching:

Try to know each student�??s needs and preferences first, and do your best to motivate the student by giving him/her challenging activities that he/she is capable of doing. An instructor should be able to determine the appropriate level of difficulty that a particular student can handle.
Be creative when presenting lessons. Although adult ESL lessons should be formal and systematized, an instructor could still use videos, music and other forms of media related to the lessons.
Keep in mind that instructors should be able to encourage good performance in class, as well as positive behavior so that the students could easily recall what they have learned in the previous lessons. This also means that, somehow, it is the instructor�??s responsibility to help students by providing activities and exercises that would encourage them to think and recall what they have learned from class before.

The lessons that the students learned should eventually be incorporated in a new setting other than the classroom. It is crucial for the instructor to keep this in mind as well.

There are various barriers involved in learning ESL. Probably the most difficult barrier to handle is the language barrier, which is why many instructors still struggle to correct the pronunciation of some of the English words, the grammatical errors, etc. However, it is still the responsibility of the instructor to make an effort to break these barriers and create a good learning environment. By and large, still, being an ESL teacher is not easy because there are so many things to consider and there are just so many things that he/she needs to learn.

For more ESL teaching methods, tips and tricks, kindly refer to the links shown below:
Internet TESL Journal: Tips for Teaching ESL Beginners and Pre-Literate Adults �?? Provides helpful and straightforward ideas on how to teach adult students who are also beginners in the English language.
Center for Adult English Language Acquisition: Teaching Low-Level Adult ESL Learners �?? Defines the several types of low level English learners and discusses the various learning necessities of each type. It also provides suggestions and some helpful techniques on how to deal with such students.
Cambridge University Press: Grammar Matters �?? Teaching Grammar in Adult ESL Programs [PDF] �?? Teaching Grammar in Adult ESL Programs [PDF] �?? Discusses various teaching methods, and their respective advantages and limitations. It also covers how to choose which kind of English grammar an instructor should teach in class.
Hopelink Adult Education Tutor Support: Teaching ESL FAQs �?? Provides answers to most of the questions asked by ESL instructors. It also provides some helpful tips on how to deal with beginners.
Lost in Translation: Reaching Out to English-Language Learners �?? Discusses why there is an influx of non-native English learners in English-speaking countries, and provides some information on how to teach them as an English instructor.
ESL/EFL Teaching/Learning Resources: Reading �?? A quick guide for any English teacher.
Sounds of English: Pronunciation Tips for Teachers �?? English pronunciation is crucial in learning English, which is why this would be a good guide for English teachers whose students are studying ESL.
Teach English, Teach About the Environment �?? This provides teaching instructions not only about learning English, but also about how to conserve the environment.
Honolulu Community College: Principles of Adult Learning �?? Defines what are adult learners in general. In addition, it provides tips on how to motivate adults to learn, and how to break the learning barriers.
International Center New York: Conversation Tips �?? Various ESL conversation topics are presented. In the latter part of the article, there are some tips and tricks on how to make conversation exercises easier for everybody in the class.
English Language Development: English as a Second Language �?? General tips on how to teach ESL. Although the tips are intended for young learners, majority of these tips are very detailed and can be utilized in teaching an adult ESL.
Tips for Teaching English as a Foreign Language �?? Provides an overview on teaching English as a foreign language.
Brigham Young University Humanities: Adult Education ESL Teachers Guide [PDF] �?? Provides very detailed explanations on how to be an ESL teacher for adult learners. It also discusses the English language and some of its principles.
Teaching Guides and Strategies �?? Details of various teaching strategies are presented.
Division of Economic and Financial Studies Learning and Teaching Centre: How to Lead Discussions �?? Learning Through Engagement [PDF] �?? Learning Through Engagement [PDF] - Tips on how to manage class discussions and student interaction.
How to Become a Good English Teacher to Non-Native Speakers of English �?? Tackles on various learning styles, common instructor teaching strategies, and various considerations when teaching ESL to adults.
International Teacher Training Organization: What makes a good TEFL TESL TESOL Teacher? �?? A short article on the general characteristics that a good English teacher should have.
Expanding ESL, Civics, and Citizenship Education in Your Community �?? This government guide has many tips reguarding classroom setting, ettiquette, and ideas about setting up a program without use of a regular school area or classroom.
TESOL Tips - Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) fun tips and teaching ideas.
Teaching Large Multilevel Classes �?? This is a guide for teaching ESL classes to a group of people who may be at different stages in their English speaking levels.
5 Tips For Your First Day As a Successful TESOL Teacher �?? How to Conduct Your First Class �?? How to Conduct Your First Class �?? A good read for first time TESOL teachers because the suggestions are very easy to understand.
500 Tips for Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages [PDF] �?? Covers everything that a TESOL teacher should know before conducting English lessons. Teaching fundamentals such as lesson planning, addressing the learning necessities of the students, language teaching methods and a whole lot more are discussed in detail.
Techniques for Teaching Adults, and Structuring Your Classroom Presentation [PDF] �?? Presents effective teaching methods that an instructor could opt for his/her classes.
Teaching Pronunciation: A Handbook for Teachers and Trainers �?? This is a full guide about tips and tricks to teaching proper pronunciation of English words.
WVABE Instructor Handbook: Teaching English as a Second Language (ESL) in West Virginia [PDF] �?? Discussion on the various factors that affect language learning, on the most appropriate ESL materials to use for a particular student�??s level, on cultural considerations and more.

Related Articles


Read more: Tips for Teaching ESL to Adults

Friday, December 7, 2012

More on CLIL: "How to do it?"

Source: http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/articles/clil-%E2%80%93-how-do-it
--------
CLIL – how to do it
If you've not worked in CLIL before, this article will give you a point to start from, in terms of both learners and materials. TeachingEnglish is currently growing its CLIL resources, and you can find more articles and activities on this page: www.teachingenglish.org.uk/clil.
“Chris, we’ve been asked to work with some schools to develop their CLIL courses. Can you look after that?” That was the first time I heard the term CLIL. I said yes, not really knowing what I was letting myself in for, but now, many years down the line I hope some things I learnt can be of use to others having to design and teach CLIL courses.
Much has been written on what CLIL is and why to do it, for example the articles on TeachingEnglish, but there is very little practical guidance on how to plan and teach CLIL lessons. If you are a subject teacher who has been asked to teach in English (or any other language for that matter), or a language teacher who has been asked to help teach content then this article will show you where to start.
Where to startThe first things to think about when planning a CLIL lesson, or indeed a whole course, are the who and the what. That is who your students are – their level of English (or whatever the second language is), level of content knowledge, and their requirements. What refers to what you will teach, in terms of both content and language, and what materials to use. The who feeds in to the what.
Who your students areIn one secondary school in Italy that I taught CLIL in the students had generally quite a high level of English and that meant that I could focus more on the content side (here science and technology), using English as a vehicle for content. With these students, I was able to adapt material designed for native English pupils. On the other hand, in another school the English level was quite weak, so I had to go for a more language-oriented approach, focusing on the particular vocabulary related to the content areas (in this case art and design). With these pupils, native English text books were linguistically too hard for them, so I had to write and adapt my own materials to both teach key art and design vocabulary and also develop language skills, with the goal of allowing these students to be able to use “real” English content text books by their last year of school.
Cognitive load
Another important factor to consider when selecting materials is cognitive load – that is you don’t want to blow their brains with too much information. This can be done by choosing a relatively simple content area or by using an area that you have already covered in L1 and doing the CLIL lesson / course as revision and extension.
A colleague in a Japanese university recently explained to me how he chose his materials. He teaches an introductory English course to help science and engineering undergraduates be able to cope with the English that they will need later on at university. To do this he uses a science text book designed for native English secondary schools. This works very well for both teacher and student as the content level is not too hard, but provides an authentic context for the vocabulary that the students will need later on. As the book is already there with its exercises ready-made, all that remains for the teacher is to design activities to teach the language that is in the book.
Finding CLIL materials
There are also many sources of materials on the internet, some good ones are in the Links section of this site . One particularly useful one is Wikipedia, both the normal English and the 'Simple English' sites are great sources of texts that can be legally adapted and used in class.
If language teachers and content teachers are working together then it’s vital to work as a team. If you can then observe each other’s lessons and talk together. Content teachers will have loads of materials which you may be able to find equivalents of in English, and language teachers will probably have ideas as to how to exploit those materials for language.
How to exploit materials
When you’ve found a text that you want to cover (written or listening), the next question is how to exploit it. Here language teachers are in familiar territory, but subject teachers are probably less familiar with the techniques of how to exploit a text for language. One of the first aspects to think about may be the vocabulary – is there any technical or specialist vocabulary that your students need to know for the course or to understand the text? If so then you might want to pre-teach this by getting students to match words to definitions or pictures, or by making a gap-fill. Alternatively, you could help them discover the meanings through the text – helping them to guess meaning from context.
Your main activity will probably concentrate on general comprehension of the text. You can do this with comprehension questions, information gaps, jigsaw reading tasks, jumble tasks, or many of the other ideas on the Try section of TeachingEnglish.
Follow-up activities can work on reinforcing the vocabulary taught earlier and developing both language skills and comprehension of the topic. These activities can include group discussions, individual presentations, making posters and writing about the topic (for homework or in class).
Have a look at the CLIL activities on TeachingEnglish for more ideas.
Conclusion
David Graddol once noted that when CLIL works, it works well, but it is hard to do well. Hopefully this article will help you to avoid some of the pitfalls – spending too much time looking for materials and designing. I’m sure you’ll enjoy the rewarding experience of being a CLIL teacher – seeing your students develop their language as well as knowledge and understanding of the world. If you have any comments, please feel free to write them below and we can start a discussion on the area of CLIL lesson and course planning.
By Chris Baldwin

Learning English or Learning in English?

There has been a persistent debate among EL professionals in Vietnam on whether or not to offer ESP courses to university students. Some say yes, emphatically so, and others say NO! NO! NO!, vehemently. And it seems we still have to wait a long while before there is an answer to this question.

Well, I myself believe that students should not JUST learn English; it's boring and ineffective. There must be something about the content in the English lessons/courses that we offer our students. But how to do that I don't know.

In the UK and in the world, however, it seems that they have an answer ready for this. It's CLIL: content and language integrated learning.

But what is CLIL? Read the article below and you will find out.

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/2005/apr/20/guardianweekly.guardianweekly1

-------------

Learning English or learning in English: will we have a choice?

A debate about global education and the role of English as the language of instruction
In association with Macmillan Education and OneStopEnglish

Content and Language Integrated Learning (Clil) and the use of English as the language of instruction has moved from experimental research to the centre of global education. As pressure grows on governments and education planners to raise English language levels, the promise of teaching the language while teaching other subjects has become hard to resist. But Clil and English-medium raises important issues of ethics, it challenges the role of EL teachers and there is concern that its implementation is outpacing a measured debate about the impact on students and teachers of using an L2 as the medium of instruction.

English Language teachers have a very important voice in that debate and the Guardian Weekly, in association with Macmillan Education, staged a special debate about Clil and its impact on English language teaching at the 2005 International Association of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language conference in Cardiff in April.

On these Clil Debate pages we have compiled an information resource about Clil and English medium.

You can read articles by the three debate presenters and hear audio highlights from their presentations (below).

You can also read highlights from the debate question and answer session.Read the transcript here

You can learn more about Clil and English medium from our background articles Read the articles here

You can also send send us your comments about Clil and English medium and we will add them to a feedback section clil.debate@guardian.co.uk.Learning English or learning in English: will we have a choice?
Guardian Weekly Macmillan Education debate at Iatefl 2005

Location: Iatefl Annual Conference, Cardiff

Date: Friday 8 April 2005

Time: 9am-10.30am

Outline
Where is Clil? What will it mean for traditional English language teaching? How should Clil be implemented? These are the core questions that our panel of experts presenting on and discussed at the Iatefl conference in April.Chair
Catherine Walter
lectures at the Institute of Education, University of London and is co-author of The Good Grammar Book

Presenters
David Marsh is one of Europe's leading Clil experts.
Having defined Content and Language Integrated Learning (Clil), David Marsh opened by showing how it is applied worldwide. Although there are substantial differences globally, various core methodological and theoretical issues are common to all regions. These were introduced as drivers, the forces behind the spread of English as the medium of instruction, and enablers, the practical tools and platforms that enable it to take root and were brought together in an attempt to answer a commonly voiced question: Is Clil the Trojan Horse that will drive English ever deeper into the heart of national educational systems?Read David Marsh's article
Hear highlights from David Marsh's presentation (5 mins)Gisella Lange is a senior language education policy maker in Northern Italy.
Clil has had an important implementation in Italy, particularly in northern regions, and different forms of Clil have developed within schools (eg language-led, subject-led varieties). In the past three years the regional education authority in Lombardy has offered web-based training courses aimed at creating Clil didactic modules to be used by language and subject teachers in their classes. Team-work and interactive approaches have created productive dynamics in class developing good practice of "integrated" teaching and learning.Read Gisella Lange's article
Hear highlights from Gisella Lange's presentation (5 mins) David Graddol is a leading writer, broadcaster and lecturer on issues related to global English
In a world in which English seems so much in demand it may seem perverse to suggest that English teachers, as we know them today, are an endangered species. This, however, may be one of many significant consequences of a global shift towards Clil. Such trends are likely to transform the role of English teachers and their relationships to learners and institutions. As English becomes positioned as a generic learning skill, alongside basic literacy and maths, and is taught to ever-younger learners, English specialists may find themselves more marginalised and their professional knowledge and experience less influential in the way English curriculums are designed and delivered. David Graddol drew on new research carried out for the British Council which explores recent and future trends in English worldwide and commented on their likely impact on the ELT profession and business.
Read David Graddol's article
Hear highlights from David Graddol's presentation (6 mins)